Frailty: Assessment and Intervention

Article information

Keimyung Med J. 2024;43(2):100-106
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 November 11
doi : https://doi.org/10.46308/kmj.2024.00108
1Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, Korea
2Department of Family Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
Corresponding Author: DaeHyun Kim, MD, PhD Department of Family Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, 1035, Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Korea E-mail: dhkim@dsmc.or.kr
Received 2024 September 27; Revised 2024 October 11; Accepted 2024 October 21.

Abstract

Frailty poses a complex challenge to the health and well-being of aging populations, particularly in South Korea, where its prevalence is substantial and increasing. This review explores the landscape of frailty assessment and management in Korea, emphasizing the transition from a disease-centric approach to one focused on maintaining functional abilities and promoting healthy aging. This review covers various frailty screening tools, comprehensive geriatric assessment methods, and targeted interventions across domains such as polypharmacy, physical activity, nutrition, oral health, vitamin D supplementation, cognitive function, falls, and social frailty. The integration of these strategies aims to address the multifaceted nature of frailty and improve health outcomes for older adults. Furthermore, the importance of regular monitoring and reassessment is highlighted to guide personalized interventions and optimize outcomes, particularly for older adults with chronic illnesses. Through a multifaceted approach encompassing medical, social, and functional dimensions, this review advocates for effective frailty management to enhance the health and well-being of elderly in Korea and globally.

Introduction

The World Health Organization redefined healthy aging in 2001 as the capacity to engage in personally meaningful activities as individuals age, regardless of disease burden [1]. This paradigm shift highlights the transition from a pathology-focused healthcare approach to one centered on maintaining functional abilities.

The Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, through the fifth iteration of the National Health Plan (Health Plan 2030) in 2022, prioritized the transition from managing chronic diseases to fostering health-promoting behaviors and preventing frailty [2]. It advocates for restructuring the public health services for older adults, moving away from an exclusive focus on chronic disease management toward a comprehensive healthcare system encompassing frailty prevention. Additionally, the plan highlights the need to explore avenues for delivering frailty management services within primary healthcare settings [2].

Frailty is a multifaceted biological syndrome characterized by reduced physiological reserve and increased susceptibility to stressors [3]. This condition stems from the progressive decline across various physiological systems, rendering individuals more susceptible to adverse health outcomes and functional decline [3]. Frailty is defined by the presence of three or more of the following five Fried frailty phenotype criteria: weight loss, exhaustion, decreased energy expenditure, decreased walking speed, and decreased grip strength [4]. When an individual exhibits one or two of these phenotype criteria, they are considered to be in a pre-frail state, while the absence of all indicates robustness [4].

Applying the Fried frailty phenotype criteria to the data from South Korea in 2008, the prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty was found to be 7.8% and 50.4%, respectively [5]. This indicates that more than half of the surveyed population displayed characteristics of frailty or pre-frailty [5]. It is known that the prevalence of frailty increases with age, and South Korea’s older adult population is growing continually [6]. The proportion of individuals aged ≥ 65 years in South Korea is estimated to increase from 17.5% in 2022 to 46.4% by 2070 [7]. Therefore, frailty can be considered a significant medical and social issue in Korea. Assessing frailty is crucial for identifying individuals at risk and implementing targeted interventions to mitigate its impact on overall health and quality of life. Therefore, this review aims to investigate the screening, comprehensive assessment, and management of frailty in older adults in South Korea.

Frailty screening and assessment tools

Internationally used frailty assessment tools include the fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight (FRAIL) Scale, Program of Research to Integrate the Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy 7, fried frailty phenotype, Groningen Frailty Indicator, frailty index, Clinical Frailty Scale, Edmonton Frail Scale, and Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) [8,9]. These tools often utilize self-reported questionnaires and assess vision, hearing, general health status, gait speed, cognitive function, and social functioning. They may vary in the types of items assessed, time required for evaluation, and scoring methods. Performing physical examinations, such as gait speed and grip strength, may decrease the actual utilization rate in primary healthcare settings due to time constraints. The Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire solely comprises survey items, making it suitable for screening assessments in primary healthcare settings [10]. Since the Korean version of the FRAIL Scale is designed with only five items, it is convenient to administer in primary healthcare environments. Screening using the Korean Frailty Index for Primary Care (KFI-PC) begins with a 5-item questionnaire for a preliminary assessment. If three or more items indicate frailty, then further assessment is conducted using the full KFI-PC [11]. This assessment includes 56 items to identify risk factors for frailty, such as malnutrition, lack of exercise, muscle weakness, social inactivity, and cognitive impairment [10,11]. The characteristics of these tools are summarized in Table 1.

Frailty screening and assessment tools

Comprehensive geriatric assessment

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) plays a vital role in addressing frailty by evaluating various aspects of the older person’s health [12]. By identifying and addressing multiple factors contributing to frailty, interdisciplinary CGA interventions have reduced the risk of hospitalization by approximately 10% in older individuals with frailty [13]. Its holistic approach ensures tailored interventions to meet specific needs, thereby enhancing overall health and well-being [13]. The Korean Brief Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Questionnaire, developed in 2006, lacked tracking observations for positive findings identified during screening, thus limiting its practical utility [14]. The Korean Comprehensive Assessment Tools were developed in 2013 to address this, offering a short form suitable for use in primary healthcare settings where time constraints are a concern [15]. The characteristics of the three aforementioned Korean CGA tools are presented in Table 2.

Characteristics of the 3 Korean Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment tools

Interventions

Polypharmacy

Polypharmacy can lead to inappropriate medication prescriptions in older adults, increasing the risk of adverse effects. Reviewing and adjusting polypharmacy can reduce emergency room visits and medication costs and improve the quality of life [16]. The 2023 Beer criteria are international guidelines on medication usage in older adults. They help healthcare professionals make better decisions about managing medications for older patients, ensuring their health and safety [17]. According to a study on the current status of polypharmacy in South Korea and strategies for appropriate management, the introduction of the Drug Utilization Review in South Korea has played a significant role in preventing adverse effects resulting from inappropriate medication prescriptions [18].

Physical activity

Individuals with frailty are advised to engage in physical activities, including resistance, aerobic, and balance exercises [12]. However, the type and intensity of exercise that older people with frailty can safely perform vary from person to person. Therefore, prioritizing the assessment of physical activity capacity is essential. In this regard, objective measurement tools, such as Short Physical Performance Battery, Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire, and Senior Fitness Test, should be utilized [19].

According to the Physical Activity Guidelines for Koreans Revised Edition, published by the Korea Health Promotion Institute, older adults are encouraged to engage in moderate-intensity aerobic physical activities, such as walking for more than 2 hours and 30 minutes per week, or high-intensity aerobic physical activities for at least 1 hour and 15 minutes per week. It is recommended to practice for at least 10 minutes at a time, spreading it out over several days. Strength training should be performed at least twice a week, targeting all parts of the body, with 8–12 repetitions per set. After strength training, it is advised to rest the muscles for at least 1 day and gradually increase the weight or number of sets. Balance exercises aimed at preventing falls include Tai Chi, sideways walking, heel walking, tiptoe walking, and standing up from a sitting position. Patients are advised to start with support bars initially and gradually transition to performing the exercises without support [1].

Park et al. [20] conducted a study aimed at assessing the condition of older individuals with frailty living at home, developing exercise programs tailored to frailty, and validating their effectiveness. The results of implementing a 6-week exercise program showed a significant reduction in depression among the participants. Although not statistically significant, an overall improvement in their physical condition was also observed [20].

Nutrition

The Shortened Version of the Mini Nutritional Assessment is a brief nutritional assessment tool that can be conducted in under 10 minutes in primary healthcare settings [21]. Older individuals with malnutrition should consume 1.5 g of protein per kilogram of body weight per day [22].

In Korea, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is substantial (86.8% in males and 93.3% in females) [23]. A meta-analysis showed that higher concentrations of vitamin D correlate with a reduced risk of frailty [24]. However, further research is warranted to determine whether vitamin D supplementation can have a positive effect on fractures, falls, muscle mass, strength, and balance in older adults. For patients with frailty having vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D supplementation is advisable [12].

Frailty syndrome

Oral frailty

The deterioration of oral health and subsequent malnutrition among older individuals are recognized as significant risk factors for frailty [25]. In 2022, clinical practice guidelines for oral frailty in primary healthcare settings in Korea were released, and the key points are outlined below. Screening for oral frailty is recommended for individuals aged ≥ 65 years [26]. For seniors diagnosed with oral frailty, low-intensity exercises, salivary gland massage, and orofacial exercises should be considered [24]. For seniors experiencing oral dryness, prescribing saliva substitutes or recommending salivary gland massage to alleviate oral discomfort is advised. Routine dental check-ups for individuals aged ≥ 65 years are recommended to manage periodontal health, ensure denture maintenance, and address issues related to tooth decay [26].

Cognitive frailty

In patients diagnosed with frailty, cognitive function evaluation can be considered using the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination [12]. However, there is insufficient evidence that interventions for cognitive dysfunction can manage frailty [27]. Therefore, interventions focusing on controlling cardiovascular risk factors, nutritional supplementation, and exercise therapy are recommended [12].

Social frailty

Social frailty arises from various physical, psychological, and social deficiencies, such as hearing impairment, walking difficulties, living alone, and decreased social interactions [28]. Recently, there has been a growing emphasis on social frailty due to its potential to accelerate appetite loss, malnutrition, and physical decline [29]. Social frailty can be objectively assessed using tools such as the TFI or the Korean Version of the Lubben Social Network Scale [30,31]. Although research on interventions for social frailty is limited, efforts are being made to integrate social frailty aspects into existing frailty interventions. For instance, physical activity interventions may include participation in group exercise programs [12].

Fall

In patients with frailty, screening for falls (including fall history inquiry, gait, and balance assessment) is conducted while considering multifactorial fall risk assessment and interventions for fall prevention in high-risk individuals [12]. The falls prevention clinical practice guidelines developed by the Korean Society of Internal Medicine and the Korean Geriatrics Society recommend fall screening and multifactorial fall assessment for older patients visiting outpatient clinics. Fall screening comprises the following two simple questions: (1) Have you experienced two or more falls in the past year? and (2) Do you have any problems with walking or maintaining balance? [32].

Monitoring

Frailty is not a static concept occurring at a specific point in time; therefore, regular assessment and monitoring are necessary [33]. Reassessing CGA and focusing on areas where deterioration is observed are recommended. Annual reassessment is advised for older adults with frailty aged ≥ 75 years or those with chronic illnesses [12].

Conclusion

Frailty, a dynamic and multifaceted condition, poses significant challenges to the health and well-being of aging populations, particularly in Korea. The high prevalence of frailty highlights the urgent need for comprehensive frailty assessment and management strategies. Individuals aged ≥ 65 years should undergo screening for frailty. Subsequently, they should receive focused interventions based on the CGA results. Regular monitoring and reassessment of the frailty status, especially in older adults aged ≥ 75 years or those with chronic illnesses, are crucial for guiding personalized interventions and optimizing health outcomes. By adopting a multifaceted approach encompassing medical, social, and functional aspects, effective frailty management can be achieved, promoting the health and well-being of older individuals in Korea and globally.

Notes

Acknowledgements

None.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Funding

None.

References

1. World Health Assembly, 69. The global strategy and action plan on ageing and health 2016–2020: towards a world in which everyone can live a long and healthy life. World Health Organization. [cited 2024 Jun 12]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/252783.
2. The 5th National Health Plan (HP2030). Korea Health Promotion Institute. [cited 2024 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www.khealth.or.kr/healthplaneng.
3. Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA, Anker SD, Bauer JM, Bernabei R, et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013;14:392–7.
4. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol: Series A 2001;56:M146–57.
5. Lee Y, Kim J, Han ES, Ryu M, Cho Y, Chae S. Frailty and body mass index as predictors of 3-year mortality in older adults living in the community. Gerontology 2014;60:475–82.
6. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60:1487–92.
7. Statistics Korea. Population Prospects of the World and South Korea (based on the 2021 Population Projections). [cited 2024 Apr 11]. Available from: https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a20108080000&bid=11748&act=view&list_no=420706.
8. Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur J Intern Med 2016;31:3–10.
9. Deng Y, Sato N. Global frailty screening tools: Review and application of frailty screening tools from 2001 to 2023. Intractable Rare Dis Res 2024;13:1–11.
10. Kim S, Kim M, Jung HW, Won CW. Development of a frailty phenotype questionnaire for use in screening community-dwelling older adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020;21:660–4.
11. Won CW. Up-to-date knowledge of frailty. J Korean Med Assoc 2022;65:108–14.
12. You HS, Kwon YJ, Kim S, Kim YH, Kim YS, Kim Y, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for managing frailty in community-dwelling Korean elderly adults in primary care settings. Korean J Fam Med 2021;42:413–24.
13. Beswick AD, Rees K, Dieppe P, Ayis S, Gooberman-Hill R, Horwood J, et al. Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2008;371:725–35.
14. Jung SY, Kwon IS, Cho B, Yoon JL, Rho YG, Lee E, et al. Reliability and validity of Korean brief comprehensive geriatric assessment questionnaire. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2006;10:67–76.
15. Cho B, Son KY, Oh B, Kim SJ, Kwon IS, Park BJ, et al. Development and validity and reliability of Korean comprehensive assessment tools for geriatric ambulatory care. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2013;17:18–27.
16. Woodford HJ, Fisher J. New horizons in deprescribing for older people. Age Ageing 2019;48:768–75.
17. By the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023;71:2052–81.
18. Park H, Sohn HS, Kwon J. Reviews on the current status and appropriate management of polypharmacy in South Korea. Korean J Clin Pharm 2018;28:1–9.
19. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Physical Activity Guidelines for Koreans Revised Edition 2023. [cited 2024 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www.mohw.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10411010100&bid=0019&act=view&list_no=1479208&tag=&nPage=1.
20. Park YI, Lee KY, Kim TI, Jeon MH, Kim DO, Kim JH. The effects of exercise in the frail elderly. Res Community Public Health Nurs 2012;23:91–101.
21. Park HK, Lim BK, Choi SH, Lee HR, Lee DS. Verification of the appropriateness when a shortened version of the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) Is applied for determining the malnutrition state of elderly patients. J Clin Nutr 2009;2:13–18.
22. Park Y, Choi JE, Hwang HS. Protein supplementation improves muscle mass and physical performance in undernourished prefrail and frail elderly subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2018;108:1026–33.
23. Choi HS, Oh HJ, Choi H, Choi WH, Kim JG, Kim KM, et al. Vitamin D insufficiency in Korea--a greater threat to younger generation: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2008. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:643–51.
24. Ju SY, Lee JY, Kim DH. Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and the risk of frailty syndrome: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 2018;18:206.
25. Hakeem FF, Bernabé E, Sabbah W. Association between oral health and frailty: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Gerodontology 2019;36:205–15.
26. So JS, Jung HI, Kim NH, Ko SM, Lee Linton J, Kim J, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for oral frailty. J Korean Dent Assoc 2023;61:26–58.
27. Dent E, Lien C, Lim WS, Wong WC, Wong CH, Ng TP, et al. The Asia-pacific clinical practice guidelines for the management of frailty. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017;18:564–75.
28. Kim D, Arai H. Social frailty. Korean J Geriatr Gerontol 2015;16:44–49.
29. Bunt S, Steverink N, Olthof J, van der Schans CP, Hobbelen JSM. Social frailty in older adults: a scoping review. Eur J Ageing 2017;14:323–34.
30. Gobbens RJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2010;11:344–55.
31. Lee KW, Kim SY, Chung W, Hwang GS, Hwang YW, Hwang IH. The validity and reliability of Korean version of lubben social network scale. Korean J Fam Med 2009;30:352–8.
32. Kim KI, Jung HK, Kim CO, Kim SK, Cho HH, Kim DY, et al, ; Korean Association of Internal Medicine, ; The Korean Geriatrics Society. Evidence-based guidelines for fall prevention in Korea. Korean J Intern Med 2017;32:199–210.
33. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013;381:752–62.

Article information Continued

Table 1.

Frailty screening and assessment tools

Title Country Year Time (min) Number of items Components Frailty classification Korean version
FRAIL Scale US 2008 < 10 5 Fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, loss of weight Frailty 3 items; pre-frail 1–2 items; robust = 0 items Available
PRISMA-7 Canada 2008 < 10 7 Self-reported: age (85 years), male, social support and ADLs Frailty: score ≥ 3 NA
Frailty phenotype questionnaire US 2001 < 10 5 It assesses physical characteristics or phenotype, which include five domains: unintentional weight loss (4.5 kg or more in the last year), exhaustion (self-reported), low physical activity, weakness (low grip strength), and walking speed. Frailty: ≥ 3 items; pre-frailty: 1–2 items; robust: 0 items NA
Groningen Frailty Indicator Netherlands 2001 < 15 15 Physical (9 items), cognitive (1 item), social (3 items), and psychological (2 items), for a total of 4 dimensions. Frailty: score ≥ 4 NA
Frailty Index Canada 2001 30 30–70 All the 8 frailty items and all the 3 domains (physical, psychological and social) are assessed. Frailty: score > 0.25; pre-frailty: 0.12–0.25; robust: score < 0.12 NA
Clinical Frailty Scale Canada 2005 < 5 1 Total 9 points: each point on its scale has a visual chart and a written description of frailty to assist the classification process. Frailty: score ≥ 5 NA
Edmonton Frail Scale(EFS) Canada 2006 < 5 9 The EFS is an 11-item scale, of which 9 items are self-reported, it is assesses nine domains of frailty (cognition, general health status, functional independence, social support, medication usage, nutrition, mood, continence, functional performance). Cut-offs are used to classify frailty severity: not frailty (0–5), apparently vulnerable (67), mildly frailty (8–9), moderately frailty (10–11) and severely frailty NA
Tilburg Frailty Indicator Netherlands 2010 < 15 15 The TFI is composed of 2 parts: Part A about “determinants of frailty and diseases”, and Part B about the “presence of frailty” that generates a final score. Part B includes three domains (physical, psychological, and social) and 15 items. Frailty: score ≥ 5 NA
Screening questionnaire for frailty South Korea 2019 < 5 5 Fatigue, muscle weakness, reduced walking speed, decreased physical activity, weight loss Frailty: ≥ 3 items; pre-frailty: 1–2 items; robust: 0 items Available
Korean Frailty Index South Korea 2010 < 5 8 Overall health status, including the frequency of hospitalizations and subjective health assessments. Medication usage patterns. Nutritional status, particularly any instances of weight loss. Emotional well-being, focusing on symptoms of depression. Incidences of urinary incontinence. Mobility and walking capabilities. Communication abilities, with attention to any impairments in hearing. Frailty: ≥ 3 items; pre-frailty: 1–2 items; robust: 0 items Available
Korean Frailty Index for Primary Care South Korea 2020 30 53 Cognitive status including delirium or dementia; mood; communication including vision, hearing, and speech; mobility; balance; bowel function; bladder function; ability to carry out activities of daily living; nutrition; and social resources. Frailty: score ≥ 0.23 Available

ADL, activity of daily living; EFS, Edmonton Frail Scale; TFI, Tilburg Frailty Indicator; NA, non-available.

Table 2.

Characteristics of the 3 Korean Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment tools

Korean Brief Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Questionnaire Korean Comprehensive Assessment
Form - Standard form Short form
Year 2006 2013 2013
Time (min) < 15 40–50 10–15
Number of items 32 49 28
Self-recording questionnaire Chronic disease, medication Chronic disease, medication Chronic disease, medication
Subjective health status, frailty Subjective health status, frailty Subjective health status, frailty
Alcohol, smoking, physical activity Alcohol, smoking, physical activity Alcohol, smoking, physical activity
- Quality of sleep Quality of sleep
Urinary incontinence Dysuresia Dysuresia
Weight loss Oral health Oral health
- Vaccination Vaccination
Fall Fall and housing Fall and housing
6 Questions (ADL 4 + IADL 2) ADL, IADL 6 Questions (ADL 4 + IADL 2)
GDS 5questions Short-form GDS GDS 5questions
Depression Basic information for elderly -
Social support Social support Social support
Assessment of physical function BMI Height, body weight -
Mental state: 3 word recall, digit forward and backward, time orientation MMSE-K Memory and recall: 3 word recall
Vision, hearing Visual acuity, hearing test Hearing test
Upper extremity function Upper extremity function -
Lower extremity: gait time, gait difficulty Lower extremity function and balance Lower extremity function and balance

ADL, activity of daily living; IADL, instrumental activity of daily living; GDS, geriatric depression screening scale; BMI, body mass index; MMSE-K, mini-mental state examination Korean version; -, not applicable.